So the word is out. I've sealed the deal on my next book, to be called "FREE". Here's how New York Magazine described it:
Long Tail Author Sells Next: Chris Anderson, author of much-cited paradigm-shifter The Long Tail, sells new book Free to Will Schwalbe at Hyperion. Agent is John Brockman. New title explores "the most radical price of all — zero — in the context of the economics of abundance." Times Magazine editors crack knuckles.
I actually have no idea what that last sentence means.
The book is due to be finished by mid-2008, for publication as soon after that as possible.
Here are some of the subtitles I've been kicking around:
1) FREE:
The story of a radical price (zero)
2) FREE: How $0.00 changed the world
3) FREE: How companies get rich by charging nothing
4) FREE: The economics of abundance and the marketplace without money
5) FREE: The past and future of a radical price.
I kind of like #5. What do you think?
#3 for me!
Posted by: dwlt | May 20, 2007 at 11:00 PM
what, are you telling me it won't be free!!!
Posted by: brian | May 20, 2007 at 11:03 PM
#3 for me too.
Brian - let's hope there'll be an online version we can read for free, a la 37Signals - Getting Real.
Posted by: N.Cauldwell | May 20, 2007 at 11:32 PM
How about a variation on 2 - FREE: How nothing changed the world
Posted by: Mark | May 20, 2007 at 11:33 PM
I'd go for 4. I guess that "economics of abundance" is an important concept in your book.
Posted by: Ronald | May 20, 2007 at 11:33 PM
is the contraction of 3, How to Get Rich by Charging Nothing, too obvious?
See also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracking_joints
Something you said?
Posted by: Gary | May 20, 2007 at 11:51 PM
Companies have to learn how to give. And for someone trying to make a profit, the word "giving" sound insane.
We are throwing around ideas about this in our blog: www.strategyofgiving.com. (Sorry, currently only in finnish)
We think giving creates a motion in the reciever. If a company adopts a Strategy of Giving it will have to learn how to give. But more importantly it will have to learn how to redirect the motion it has created.
Posted by: Miikka Leinonen | May 20, 2007 at 11:53 PM
I like #3 because it sounds kind of paradoxical and thus grabs your attention.
Posted by: steve | May 20, 2007 at 11:54 PM
Definitely 2.
$0.00 is just too powerful a mark to be left out of the title.
Posted by: Dane Cao | May 21, 2007 at 12:00 AM
I would also prefer a variation of 2#: How zero bucks changed the world
Posted by: Felix | May 21, 2007 at 12:15 AM
Call it what you like, as long as you mention Girl Genius. But then, I don't think you need me to tell you that!
Posted by: Shaye Horwitz | May 21, 2007 at 12:16 AM
If I come up with a better one, I want a free copy of "FREE":
* Abundance and the cost of not charging nothing. (hmm...double negative)
* Why the right price is the lowest
* Never be undersold again
* Why the 5 cent lemonade stand is a thing of the past
Incidentally, it may not be your line, but I'd be wary of describing free as "the ultimate price". It immediately reminded me of soldiers making "the ultimate sacrifice", which isn't exactly a desirable connection to draw for a business book.
Posted by: Darren | May 21, 2007 at 12:27 AM
Depends on who your audience is:
Mass market - #3. Needs no explanation and makes your curious.
Your existing audience - #5. They are already half educated in your thinking so they will get the "radical price" concept. Also, they are probably people who think in terms of "future and past".
Posted by: David Koopmans | May 21, 2007 at 12:54 AM
Chris
I prefer #3.
I assume that you include the economics of multi-sided markets in your new tome. Recent research suggests that there may be scope for actually paying customers to become involved in such markets, even if they don't actually buy anything.
Graham Hill
Independent CRM Consultant
Interim CRM Manager
Posted by: Graham Hill | May 21, 2007 at 01:04 AM
Reminds me of the old Yippee's (oh dear, my roots are showing...) slogan
It's free because it's yours.
Nice to interconnect it with the idea of the social...
Posted by: Tommy Weir | May 21, 2007 at 01:10 AM
#3 by a mile. The others aren't even close..
Posted by: Jeff Atwood | May 21, 2007 at 01:18 AM
Congrats, Chris!
I kinda like #3 myself.
Posted by: Jeremy Zawodny | May 21, 2007 at 01:24 AM
Actually... You might find this relevant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steal_This_Book
From Abbie Hoffman one of the Yippee's founders
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Youth_International_Party
Oh that was a laugh looking back at all that. The followers have a website now...
http://www.stealthiswiki.org/
What newspaper had the recent headline: "the Hippies were right, green power, organic food, computers are cool"...
Posted by: Tommy Weir | May 21, 2007 at 01:25 AM
How about "FREE: How nothing changed the world"?
Posted by: Tony Leach | May 21, 2007 at 01:43 AM
Ok with the title .... but the price will be 0$ too ?
Posted by: Lovny | May 21, 2007 at 02:05 AM
Number 3 will sell more copies, but number 5 is a nicer title (from a writerly point of view) :)
Posted by: Lisa | May 21, 2007 at 02:29 AM
You're probably already aware of his work, but Mike Masnick over at Techdirt has been doing an excellent series of articles on this very topic. Here's the recap/summary.
Posted by: Mark Murphy | May 21, 2007 at 03:22 AM
I like number 3 too. Maybe "get rich" could be changed to "thrive" or some other synonym if that is the sticking point.
Best of luck with your new book!
Posted by: Colm Ryan | May 21, 2007 at 03:25 AM
How about "Free changes everything"
Posted by: Marcel | May 21, 2007 at 03:45 AM
I like #3 the best as well. It is so completely the opposite of the huge numbers that are usually thrown around in the press that it makes a vast point all on its own.
Posted by: Clarence Fisher | May 21, 2007 at 03:57 AM
"The Powers of Zero" is close. Or "Profit from Zero"
BTW when doing carwash fundraisers with my son's Odyssey of the Mind group, we found that if we set no fixed price for the wash that people would voluntarily give more $$$$ and we raised a nice amount. The wash could have been free, but people gladly paid once they had good service -- and the kids were motivated to do a better job.
Posted by: Paul Jones | May 21, 2007 at 04:20 AM
You must make at least some copies of it free, for coherence sake.
The reason why I don't like each of your suggested title:
1. I'm assuming your book isn't about just a price, but an openness, the ability to quote, try, re-use; take Wired, with the free on-line edition: I can send a like to a friend, or blog it and not have to bother about whether it will be accessible; the price makes this possible, but so does the universality of a URL. Charging it will reduce the impact, but not kill the idea---hence free isn't just about the price.
2. Some people do not use dollars. I know all Americans are xenophobic bullies, so you don't give a dime, but the biggest impact of free is to allow people to communicate without having to cope with the cripple, medieval American banking system. Free is neither zero dollars nor zero yen, euros, pounds or liras: it's zero nothing.
3. Disintermediation and personal workers are probably one of the biggest coming elements of the re-organisation of economic sectors; mentioning "companies" is missing this point---but I would like "How entrepreneurs get rich by charging nothing" as it would shift the accent on two aspects: you need to have a innovative idea, and to dedicate yourself to make it happen.
4. Great for a theoretical, scholarly, economic science version of the book---but I'd really be crying from my academic ivory tower if you make money with such a subtitle. What would become of editorial-whoring and having bright red covers after that?
5. Uh? Forget about it: your book is not about time line, neither price---and if anything, free is a very acceptable idea, at least for those paying it.
Posted by: Bertil | May 21, 2007 at 04:51 AM
I think #3 is the best one to match with your title..Since you can describe everything about how corporates are capturing the market in the initial stage of their establishment by not charging anything....
Breakdown Insurance
Posted by: sakthi | May 21, 2007 at 04:57 AM
Hello Chris, in my opinion the 3rd option is great.
Posted by: Luciano Alves de Oliveira (Brazil) | May 21, 2007 at 05:07 AM
how about:
Milton Friedman was wrong: Maybe there are free lunches...
btw, when can i expect my free copy...
Posted by: mike | May 21, 2007 at 05:07 AM
#3 does it for me.
The apparent contradiction grabs your attention making you want to know more.
Posted by: Andrew Timberlake | May 21, 2007 at 05:48 AM
I prefer #3. It sounds like one of those books that promise to tell you the '10 secrets of ridiculously successful companies' (think In Search of Excellence, Good To Great etc).
#1,#4 and #5 make the book sound like an economics text-book on pricing theory. I think they'd be risky choices for a non-fiction book aimed at the mass-market.
Posted by: Karim Bakhtiar | May 21, 2007 at 05:59 AM
Chris,
I think #3 is the one I like.
Rob
Posted by: Robert Williger | May 21, 2007 at 05:59 AM
FREE: Why Free is the New Hotness
Okay, maybe not.
What about: FREE: How giving away the store works
Posted by: Alan | May 21, 2007 at 06:42 AM
Chris,
Only #2 and #3 will sell extra copies for the title only :) Especially #3. Simple and makes a statement!
Posted by: Maurice Brand | May 21, 2007 at 07:56 AM
Really get the geeks in a lather and call it "FREE: the idea of a price of 0.00 or, one step closer to a Star Trek future."
Posted by: Ints Luters | May 21, 2007 at 07:58 AM
Got to be #3. Tells the value prop of the story outright and doesn't require you to stop and think.
Free copy for blog readers, right :-)?
Posted by: jer979 | May 21, 2007 at 08:05 AM
Free: The Story of ZERO
Posted by: Ed Brenegar | May 21, 2007 at 08:08 AM
To me it's a toss up between #3 and #4. If you're going to use the "abundance" theme heavily in the book, I like the idea of putting a stake down with "the economics of abundance"
Posted by: John Graff | May 21, 2007 at 08:09 AM
To me it's a toss up between #3 and #4. If you're going to use the "abundance" theme heavily in the book, I like the idea of putting a stake down with "the economics of abundance"
Posted by: John Graff | May 21, 2007 at 08:09 AM